...lowering the productivity of acquaintances everywhere...

"In that spirit, here is what I have to share with employees of large corporations everywhere:
I have met you in meeting rooms, hallways, on conference calls and on the internet. You work for large corporations which you detest. You arrive at your cubicle every morning with a vaguely sick feeling in your stomach and begin your day of work. You have too much to do. Co-workers left and no one replaced them, so you have inherited their job and all the work that went with it."
"National Ballet of Canada dancer Rex Harrington knows this all too well, having ruptured his Achilles tendon earlier this week during his opening night performance in Song & Dance at the Danforth Music Hall.
...the dancer, who retired from the ballet company in 2004 after 20 years, won't be returning to the role..."
In the federal election, the Conservatives promised to fix the fiscal imbalance, which is the idea that the feds have billions of dollars more than they need, while the provinces are billions of dollars short. The Liberals say the fiscal imbalance doesn't exist. Harper says it does. His stance was a key to the Tories' modest electoral breakthrough in Quebec, where complaints about the fiscal imbalance began. Fixing the imbalance will provide much of the next year's work for Harper's government.Well's nut graf:
But to fix a problem, you first need to define it. If you define the imbalance the way the provinces do -- roughly, as "all the billions we could ever dream of getting from Ottawa" -- you'll bankrupt even a flush and province-friendly government like Harper's. So Harper's definition is crucial. And as we've learned to expect from him, it's clever.
It turns out the fiscal imbalance is four problems. One, federal budget-making is too vague about the size of future surpluses. Two, the feds spend money on provincial responsibilities -- hospitals and schools -- while ignoring their own duties, like armies and Indian reserves. Three, when Ottawa does increase transfers to the provinces, it does so at the last minute and for the short term, so provinces can't plan. Four, the limited "efficiency and competitiveness of the economic union" hobbles everyone's ability, be they governments, companies or families, to increase prosperity.
Central-government fans worry that the fiscal imbalance argument is about Ottawa surrendering power to the provinces. This is more of a trade: we'll get out of your hair if you act like you deserve it. And all that nice language about the Liberal record? It's not cute, it's crucial.I think this is an interesting/important, if slightly esoteric subject, so I'll likely follow it for a while. Seeing as I'm averaging a whole 10 readers a day. of which 50% leave within 5 seconds, I don't doubt that this is just a note to myself...
The message is clear: If given the chance, this government will get out of the social policy business, restricting most of its active policy-making decisions to matters strictly under its jurisdiction. Later, that approach is further fleshed out - the government stating that "excess federal revenues [will] be used primarily to reduce federal taxes rather than to launch new policies in areas where the federal government is not best placed to design or deliver programs."
Then the paper gets really ambitious. "There have been many calls over the years for structural realignments of tax policies that would have the effect of reducing or eliminating joint occupancy of particular tax fields," it proclaims, specifically citing the recommendation that Ottawa scrap the GST altogether, reduce transfer payments and leave sales tax entirely to the provinces. Similar measures, it suggests, could also be undertaken to some measure with income or corporate taxes.
Ultimately, of course, Canadians wouldn't be taxed less; they'd just be taxed differently. By collecting directly, instead of relying on the feds, the provinces would gain even more autonomy than they presently have.
And there's a number of key points here:
1. Different provinces will respond differently. Alberta is nearing the point (if it isn't past) where it can be indifferent to the fiscal repercussions of ignoring the Canada Health Act's dictates. Granted, the public backlash would be bad, even out there, but it can do it. Giving more tax points (rather than tied cash) to all the provinces will mean that each region will have the freedom to experiment with new and different policies. It will also mean that each province will have less and less resemblance to each other over time.
"Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area, a 197,000-acre desert preserve near Las Vegas, is a top international rock climbing destination. Massive and unique sandstone formations, combined with the region's mostly agreeable weather, attract thousands of climbers a year."Check
Syl Apps Special Achievement Award Recipients:
- Roger Wallis (Etobicoke, Ontario)
The Syl Apps award recognizes Ontario volunteers who have contributed to sport within the province.




"Montillet-Carles skied with her swollen left eye held open by tape so she could see. "